Query Information
ORIGIN plant
BEGIN
>MYSEQ
TAIGGGVSVA KAQRLWKAVV GPTSSPPPIE LFHTLSSKDR AITQRVHISW
SEQGLSVRDL LFFAVFLSPI VQKKPKNSRL VLPQSYKPLS IYYYLVRACV
FGCIGCVELL VLVYSFRVLS STTFWSPRNP PSPKTSLVRF CHHGYISYPI
WKFKYNLESL SYLLSNGSDL ISKFVLSAPQ SSRFLDFLYQ DLLSLILRGC
QYLYCLGCHS EKKGFRPLQK ETEEEEKKKN EKKKK
Result Information
PSORT --- Prediction of Protein Localization Sites
version 6.4(WWW)
MYSEQ 235 Residues
*** Warning: The 1st amino acid is not methionine
Species classification: 5
*** Reasoning Step: 1
Preliminary Calculation of ALOM (threshold: 0.5)
count: 2
Position of the most N-terminal TMS: 55 at i=2
MTOP: membrane topology (Hartmann et al.)
I(middle): 62 Charge diffirence(C-N): 4.5
McG: Examining signal sequence (McGeoch)
Length of UR: 2
Peak Value of UR: 0.90
Net Charge of CR: 1
Discriminant Score: -10.63
GvH: Examining signal sequence (von Heijne)
Signal Score (-3.5): -3.43
Possible cleavage site: 43
>>> Seems to have no N-terminal signal seq.
Amino Acid Composition of Predicted Mature Form:
calculated from 1
ALOM new cnt: 2 ** thrshld changed to -2
Cleavable signal was detected in ALOM?: 0B
ALOM: finding transmembrane regions (Klein et al.)
count: 2 value: -6.53 threshold: -2.0
INTEGRAL Likelihood = -6.53 Transmembrane 98 - 114 ( 94 - 120)
INTEGRAL Likelihood = -2.34 Transmembrane 55 - 71 ( 55 - 71)
PERIPHERAL Likelihood = 2.28
modified ALOM score: 1.41
>>> Likely a Type IIIb membrane protein (Nexo Ccyt)
Gavel: Examining the boundary of mitochondrial targeting seq.
motif at: 16
QRLWKA
Discrimination of mitochondrial target seq.:
notclr ( 0.15)
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Hydrophobic moment analysis for chloroplast proteins
Hmax: 11.36 at (47)
Disc.Score from Amino Acid Composition (chloroplast)
score from the 3-11 region: 0.95
score from the 1-31 region: 7.26
Chloroplast protein? Status: negative (-3.32)
Res.2 is Ala (a feature for chloroplast seq.)
Res.2 is Ala (a feature for chloroplast seq.)
Res.2 is Ala (a feature for chloroplast seq.)
*** Reasoning Step: 2
Type IIIa or IIIb is favored for ER memb. proteins
KDEL Count: 0
Checking apolar signal for intramitochondrial sorting
(Gavel position 16) from: 60 to: 71 Score: 8.5
Mitochondrial inner membrane? Score: 0.56
Mitochondrial intermemb.space? Score: 0.09
Checking apolar signal for intrachloroplastic sorting
Howe: Checking the consensus for intrachloropl.sorting
Chloroplast thylakoid memb.? Score: 0.281
SKL motif (signal for peroxisomal protein):
pos: 78(235), count: 1 SRL
SKL score (peroxisome): 0.3
Amino Acid Composition Tendency for Peroxisome: 2.79
Peroxisomal proteins? Status: positive
Type III proteins may be localized at Golgi
Amino acid composition tendency for vacuolar proteins
Score: -1.01 Status: negative
Checking the amount of Basic Residues (nucleus)
Checking the 4 residue pattern for Nuclear Targeting
Found: pos: 72 (4) KKPK
Found: pos: 231 (5) KKKK
Checking the 7 residue pattern for Nuclear Targeting
Checking the Robbins & Dingwall consensus (nucleus)
Checking the RNA binding motif (nucleus or cytoplasm)
Nuclear Signal Status: negative ( 0.06)
Check the Number of TMSs for typeIII (plasma memb.)
Checking N-myristoylation..
----- Final Results -----
mitochondrial inner membrane --- Certainty= 0.613(Affirmative) < succ>
plasma membrane --- Certainty= 0.600(Affirmative) < succ>
chloroplast thylakoid membrane --- Certainty= 0.425(Affirmative) < succ>
Golgi body --- Certainty= 0.400(Affirmative) < succ>
----- The End -----