Query Information

ORIGIN plant
BEGIN
>MYSEQ
 RRRRRRRLHQ VDNQSTPPSS TMRKWRSSSR VSAKSSNKGG GKTTSPAPRR
 FATSVVSPVI LLLNVLYLVT VTEVTTRRGD ERKRRGITRR RAAMPMFVAN
 GTPTRAQATP PTTRTPPTSP SPRDSSSPTS ATSASWQRTA KRRLNLNPPL
 NMNPLVMTML VMRKIICVPF LPTLTLKKKN MNWLVLFMKT TTFWIPKRIV
 

Result Information

PSORT --- Prediction of Protein Localization Sites
                                            version 6.4(WWW)
MYSEQ          200 Residues
*** Warning: The 1st amino acid is not methionine
Species classification: 5

*** Reasoning Step: 1

Preliminary Calculation of ALOM (threshold: 0.5)
     count: 2
     Position of the most N-terminal TMS: 55 at i=1
MTOP: membrane topology (Hartmann et al.)
     I(middle): 62   Charge diffirence(C-N): -1.0
McG: Examining signal sequence (McGeoch)
     Length  of  UR:   2
     Peak Value of UR:  -0.64
     Net Charge of CR: 8
     Discriminant Score:    -16.71
GvH: Examining signal sequence (von Heijne)
     Signal Score (-3.5): -7.95
     Possible cleavage site: 61
>>> Seems to have no N-terminal signal seq.
Amino Acid Composition of Predicted Mature Form:
   calculated from 1
ALOM new cnt: 2 ** thrshld changed to -2
Cleavable signal was detected in ALOM?: 0B
ALOM: finding transmembrane regions (Klein et al.)
     count: 2  value:  -7.38  threshold: -2.0
     INTEGRAL    Likelihood = -7.38   Transmembrane   55 -  71 (  50 -  76)
     INTEGRAL    Likelihood = -3.40   Transmembrane  155 - 171 ( 154 - 172)
     PERIPHERAL  Likelihood =  5.99
     modified ALOM score:   1.58
>>> Likely a Type IIIa membrane protein (Ncyt Cexo)
Gavel: Examining the boundary of mitochondrial targeting seq.
      motif at: 52
     RRFATS
Discrimination of mitochondrial target seq.: 
     positive ( 2.15)
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Rule: mitochondrial protein
Hydrophobic moment analysis for chloroplast proteins 
     Hmax:  6.82 at (61)
Disc.Score from Amino Acid Composition (chloroplast)
     score from the 3-11 region: -4.62
     score from the 1-31 region:  9.43
Chloroplast protein?  Status: negative (-8.00)

*** Reasoning Step: 2

Type IIIa or IIIb is favored for ER memb. proteins
KDEL   Count: 0
Checking apolar signal for intramitochondrial sorting
  (Gavel position 52)  from: 51  to: 71  Score:  7.5
Mitochondrial inner membrane?  Score:  0.80
Mitochondrial intermemb.space?  Score:  0.09
Checking apolar signal for intrachloroplastic sorting
Howe: Checking the consensus for intrachloropl.sorting
Chloroplast thylakoid memb.?  Score: 0.315
SKL motif (signal for peroxisomal protein): 
     pos: -1(200), count: 0   
Amino Acid Composition Tendency for Peroxisome:  -1.97
Peroxisomal proteins?   Status: negative
Type III proteins may be localized at Golgi
Amino acid composition tendency for vacuolar proteins
     Score: -11.77  Status: negative
Checking the amount of Basic Residues (nucleus)
Checking the 4 residue pattern for Nuclear Targeting
     Found: pos:   1 (5) RRRR
     Found: pos:   2 (5) RRRR
     Found: pos:   3 (5) RRRR
     Found: pos:  81 (5) RKRR
Checking the 7 residue pattern for Nuclear Targeting
Checking the Robbins & Dingwall consensus (nucleus)
     Found:  pos:  76 (3) RR GDERKRRGIT RRRAA
     Found:  pos: 162 (3) RK IICVPFLPTL TLKKK
Final Robbins Score (nucleus):  0.48
Checking the RNA binding motif (nucleus or cytoplasm)
Nuclear Signal   Status: negative ( 0.08)
Check the Number of TMSs for typeIII (plasma memb.)
Checking N-myristoylation..

----- Final Results -----

     mitochondrial inner membrane --- Certainty= 0.863(Affirmative) < succ>
                  plasma membrane --- Certainty= 0.600(Affirmative) < succ>
                          nucleus --- Certainty= 0.480(Affirmative) < succ>
                       Golgi body --- Certainty= 0.400(Affirmative) < succ>


----- The End -----